Online proctoring: A balanced view

  1. Online Proctoring Methods

    Several strategies exist, each with pros and cons. Live proctoring uses human monitors, offering quick mediation but limiting adaptability. Recorded proctoring allows review of sessions, identifying cheating afterward but delaying feedback. Automated systems utilize AI for real-time monitoring, increasing efficiency but potentially introducing bias.

  2. Benefits of Online Proctoring

    Remote proctoring improves test security, enhancing identity verification and deterring cheating. It provides audit trails through recording, and allows flexible scheduling for candidates. Flexibility is a major advantage, facilitating large-scale assessments efficiently. Detailed reports can assist in improving future testing processes.

  3. Addressing Privacy Concerns

    Data protection is crucial. Systems should comply with data security laws, minimize data storage, and obtain informed consent. Candidates' privacy and respect must be prioritized, and their involvement should be considered throughout the design and implementation of the system.

  4. Limitations of Automated Systems

    Automated systems, while efficient, shouldn't solely determine candidate suitability. Automated flags for suspicious behavior, such as unusual eye movements or presence of objects, can be inaccurate and introduce bias. Human review is crucial to avoid unfair disqualifications.

  5. Accessibility and Inclusivity

    Designing accessible systems for all candidates is imperative. Proctoring arrangements should accommodate physical and learning disabilities to ensure fair assessment for everyone. This includes considering diverse needs and adapting the process accordingly.

```